Accreditation

Main Menu
Allegation of Research Misconduct
Post-Publication Discussion Policy
Jurnal Rekayasa Infrastruktur (JRI) encourages scholarly discussion and constructive feedback on articles published in the journal. Post-publication discussion provides an opportunity for researchers, academics, practitioners, and readers to communicate scientific observations, raise questions, and contribute to the development of knowledge in infrastructure engineering and related fields.
Readers who identify potential errors, methodological concerns, inconsistencies, or other substantive issues in a published article are encouraged to contact the editorial team through the journal's official communication channels. All comments and concerns must be presented professionally, supported by relevant evidence where applicable, and communicated in a respectful manner.
The editorial team will evaluate submissions or reports concerning published articles to determine whether further clarification, communication with the authors, publication of a formal comment, or another editorial action is appropriate.
Authors may be invited to respond to substantive comments concerning their work. Any decision to publish a comment or response will be made by the editorial team based on its academic relevance, accuracy, and compliance with the journal's editorial policies.
If a post-publication discussion reveals a potential error or ethical concern, the journal will investigate the matter in accordance with its Correction and Retraction Policy and Publication Ethics Policy.
JRI is committed to maintaining an open, constructive, and ethical scholarly environment while protecting the integrity of the scientific record.
Accreditation

Main Menu
Allegation of Research Misconduct
Post-Publication Discussion Policy